BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
The Defendant of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 of the Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), acknowledged the receipt of defective currency notes from the defendant, but has requested that the complainant since the magistrate and the Circle The officer did not listen before the approval of the defaulted currency notes, only the complainant's statement remained in the field, which could not be relied upon in any way that the complainant had charged him with. The debtor had returned a disputed amount of money from the loan, to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt against the prosecution. Failed, giving the accused the benefit of the doubt, he was acquitted of the charge
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Mithi lawyer
