Find a Lawyer

NASIM AHMAD versus THE STATE

The Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963 Section 2 (g) (c) denies the relationship of landlord and tenant to landlord and tenant between the parties, then on the preliminary issue that covers this dispute, The rent controller decided after recording the landlord's proof. The point, the rent controller noted in his order, that the tenant's lawyer stated that no evidence would be given by the tenants when the rent controller found that the landlord and the tenant between the parties. The clerk's relationship exists and since the rent payment is not requested, they should be fired. The tenants belonging to the premises alleged that they were not allowed to provide any opportunity for defense, and their lawyer had made a false statement that no evidence would be given to the defense lawyer who was hired by the rental controller. There was also an earlier Advocate, denying the denied statement in his affidavit and firmly dismissing that the Rent Controller had prepared an entry on either the affidavit from the CT Record homes or the landlord's lawyer. Contents of the tenant's lawyer's affidavit were on the record, correct To cope with any reason to doubt this, the nature of the proceedings and the nature of the material brought to the record by the landlord was not expected from the existence of the relationship of the landlord and tenant, tenant or their lawyer. Allow interruption and evacuation records will be recorded that the tenants were denied the right to adequate defense ask a advocate free from Kashmore lawyer