Find a Lawyer

SULTAN MAHMOOD versus NATIONAL LOGISTIC CELL

Complaints filed against sections 1 (3) (a), 2 (xiv) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and termination of their services by 25 employees were dismissed on the ground that the employer's organization was completed by the military. Is being controlled and incidentally linked to the Armed Forces. The Pakistan Ordinance, 1969 did not apply to this organization and the organization was not appreciated. Employees were admittedly civilian drivers and were not subject to any military law. Employees were not employed in defense services and even employers. The organization's witness statement was also not implemented. Indicate that the organization is operating for defense purposes only, the evidence listed in this case was minimal and insufficient, making it impossible to prove under whom the law / legislative body was constituted or on the other hand. Some documents were created to handle their duties. On the record it was appearing that the employer establishment is an organization of its own, but its motives were attached to the Planning and Development Division of the Government Tribunal for the Administrator accepting appeals against the Labor Court order which Accordingly, the complaint of the employees was dismissed; after allowing the parties to add additional evidence, the remand was decided to decide the same case. Explain how an employer's organization was formed, what law was governed in its constitution, and was there a legal principle to regulate its duties and status? female advocates from Piplan lawyer