Find a Lawyer

HABIB-UR-REHMAN versus ZEENAT-UN-NISA

Sections 42, 53 and 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Specific Relief Act 1877, Article 185 (3) it request against the defendants to appeal the suit for a declaration and permanent injunction restraining them in any way on the disputed land. Don't work. As the sale was made without the applicant's consent. The trial court denied the interim injunction and observed that the defendants were doing construction work at their own risk and would not demand compensation if the plaintiff's case was pronounced against them. The use of the application was temporary in keeping with the trial court's view and the case was still pending which would not affect the interests of the applicant as a result of the trial. However, the Supreme Court further directed the respondents to submit their rent to the trial court and the tray if they set up shops. After the final settlement of the case, the court will also make such an order in respect of the rent so that it can be submitted by the respondents by law. famous high court advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer