Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 304, Part I, 324, 326 and 452/34 evidence of persuasiveness were related to the prosecution witnesses and the accused persons and the accused persons were related to them as witnesses about the purpose of the incident. Did not say who was charged. The victim's illicit relationship with the daughter of an accused, the eyewitnesses, made statements appropriate to their design, and their testimony was diversified, without further strengthening the prosecution's case. The choice was clearly for Malala, depending on the reasons and allegations of the suspects and the manner in which the accused was murdered, the motive is that the victim killed them when they killed her on their own. Looked at a compromised and questionable location with the daughter of an accused. The conviction of the housemates affected the trust because the accused had killed him along with the accused. This is the disputed version of the accused that killed the deceased during a sudden provocation when he killed the victim in his house. Looked at the questionable location with her daughter, the trustworthy parties could not be held responsible for committing the crime, unless otherwise agreed. The convictions of the accused were set aside under Section 2302/34, PPC, Section 2302/34, and instead they were convicted on two counts under Section 4304, Part 1, PPC. While other convictions were retained under other crimes, but they were sentenced. After his arrest for such conviction, his term was also reduced to those who had already spent in prison. criminal advocate from Bahawalpur lawyer