STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN versus FARRUKH HUSSAIN
Orders of Banking Companies 1962 Section 43A / 83 (1C) The accused accused of appreciating the evidence invited only the partners to invest through the advertisement, the investment or money deposited with the accused in the advertisement. No witnesses were examined to identify the cause. While conducting a banking business, the accused presented the information he had to the State Bank and the record did not show that he had any account book or any other document through which he could provide further information to the State Bank prosecution. Failed to establish his case against the accused, the accused was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Naseerabad lawyer