Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR, BANKING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT, KARACHI versus MUNAWWAR AHMED


Banking Companies' Ordinance 1962 Section 43A / 83 (1C) Appreciating the Evidence The State Bank had every reason to issue instructions to the defendants seeking to present their business details, but the inspecting officer seized it. Did not put any effort into doing it. Record If a record does not indicate that the defendant resisted any such attempt to search his premises, he himself visited the State Bank office to ascertain the progress of the matter and all Has requested that it has no such record. The allegations leveled by the State Bank did not violate the provisions of Section 43A of the Ordinance of Banking Companies, 1962 the accused was acquitted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Alipur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.