MOMIN BAI versus RAZIA SULTANA
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 16 (1) (2) records a defense rental control strike, temporary rental deposit order after summary inquiry, but the tenant accepts the temporary rental order Failed to comply, which openly admitted, temporarily disobeying the rental order, stating that the rent controller should have temporarily examined his testimony before approving the rental order, The dispute was canceled, stating that a question for recording evidence of witnesses arose before the temporary rental order was passed. Did not happen if the order was passed under Article 16 (1). Ordinance 1979 1979 then rent was approved after recording of evidence and determination of arrears, then the question of passing the order for temporary collection of rent does not arise because the question of arrears. Eventually, a final order can be issued to dismiss or reject the withdrawal request. Ordinance 16, 1979 is pretty useless
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Abdul Hakim lawyer