Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR ALAM BABAR versus SYED BAQAR ALI SHAH GILANI

Investigations 155, 173 and 403 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) on the investigation of the accused against the accused did not find sufficient evidence against them and a magistrate filed a report for canceling the FIR against the accused. , Which was accepted by the Magistrate Sub Inspector in-charge. Under the orders of the AIG Crime Branch to the Crime Branch, thereafter a re-investigation of the cases against the accused was initiated. Such an inquiry was challenged primarily when once the Magistrate had made the order under Section 173. If a report filed by the investigating authorities is approved by the magistrate, an investigation cannot be made without the CRPC case. Obtaining appropriate orders from the relevant magistrate Contrary to the provisions of the law contained in section 403, the CCPC, which maximized the Memo Debit Victory Pro Anna and Aid Cosmb (did not affect anyone twice for the same offense twice). ) And the common law principles of freedom from self-imposed conviction (formerly evil) and `self-sufficiency offender (ex-offender) that I could be punished twice for the same offense, without any shawl, any such prohibition. Section 73 contained Cr, was not included in the CRPC: bar containing 40 403, the CCP shall apply only if an accused person has been in the process of law in a competent court. In the absence of any kind. Order to accept a police recommendation by a magistrate under Section 7373, CCPC, forbidden by the CRPC, based on the material submitted by the police or under the orders of the superior officers. Yet one can re-evaluate crime. Under the Criminal Code, limiting the investigation of crimes, the conviction of the accused attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kotla lawyer