MIR HASAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Section 2302 / T 34 The trial court had already fixed the accused (appellant) responsible for the murder of the victim and sentenced him and sentenced him, which resulted in the Crime Branch's re-investigation of the case. Another challan was also produced in the trial court. A third person, in which the two accused (appellants) were acquitted in the second challan against the third accused, and the prosecution's evidence was brought to an end. I was in trouble, made a confessional statement in the subsequent challan, but still cannot be punished because the trial court had already found the accused (appellant) responsible for the murder. There can be no problems if both cases were sentenced together and sentenced. Was served. The appeals of the accused were set aside in the circumstances and a trial was sought in the trial court so that the judgment could be re-written, based on the evidence already registered with the decision on the basis of the supplementary challan,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Wana lawyer
