FAZAL DIN versus AHMED
The West Pakistan Stability Holding Ordinance 1960 Section 13 Stability Scheme The applicant was displaced without any justification during the stabilization operation, being a very small right holder, while the respondent, much larger than that, Had benefited from its cost and could hold its small hold. Its exchange in the river meant denying the fact of its entitlement that the applicant did not occupy any land prior to the consolidation, so the lack of such occupation should not mean that the applicant at the time of first consolidation The land owned by him was restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer