The testimony of all 13 prosecution witnesses in this case was the police officer and no one was affiliated with the public during the arrest and search proceedings, allegedly defining the provisions of Section 13 D & 13E of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965. At the scene of the incident, there was a really densely populated area with shops, hawkers, and people around, where private witnesses were available to the public, but any such witnesses from the police were involved in the arrest and recovery process. No attempt was made, the weapons allegedly recovered from the accused were not presented to the court or Vita has not been presented. Accused 342, in its statement under CRPC, the accused also stated whether the weapon in question was his or not, which caused the defense's evidence to be seriously prejudiced, the trial court did not give any reason and Excluding the principles of its correct definition. Evidence was not proved against the accused, conviction and retribution of the accused could not be proved
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
