Find a Lawyer

AZIZUR RAHMAN versus PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A Trade / Grade Structure Promotion / Recruitment Rules 1983 Appellant's Claim against Salary Appellant's Removal and Related Worker Claims to Provide Relative Salary Glade in the Excerpt of the Related Grade Was rejected by Labor. The court, which dismissed his complaint request on the basis that it was not based on any contract, award or law which raises the question of whether any settlement, award or law appellant under the CBA and If there is an absence of relief between the administration, then the matter of removal of the appellant and other co-workers between the salary and grade of the appellant had to be implemented, the appellant has his own right to remove the inequality through the Labor Court. Had to be enforced if the enrollee committee formed under this agreement was not removed. The same Anomaly Committee made some decisions / observations that were cited and specific employees were allowed relevant grades f The date of their appointment room in which the Appellant was not discriminated as in the case of the Appellant. The appellant was also entitled to the grade related to the date of his appointment and also paid on the time scale provided under the Trade / Grade Selection / Promotion Recruitment Rules 1983. The decision of the appellant was decided in accordance with the Tribunal's discretion, and according to the difference in salary paid to him for the last three years before the complaint petition, the decision on the payment of arrears was required to be in accordance with the law. ? famous high court advocate from Muridkay lawyer