HABIB ULLAH versus ZAHID
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail, the trial court's cancellation granted the defendant's guarantee that neither of the accused had sustained any injury to the defendant and Nor has any overt act been declared. The suspect and one of his co-accused suffered injuries when they allegedly used poles and iron pipes by the accused and co-accused because they were stripped of arms and taken into police custody. The assumption was. The presence of the accused at the time of the incident and it cannot be said that the accused was not accounted for by any overt act due to the failure to maintain the facts on the trial court record; The bail of the commission's designated accused in the crime was wrongly granted. Under the circumstances, the order to bail the accused was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Garh Maharaja lawyer