Find a Lawyer

SARWAR KHAN versus STATE

Testimonies of Section 8 and 13b of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 were examined by two police officers as prosecution witnesses, who had no intention of being involved in false accusations, appeared to be reliable and credible. There was nothing on record to prove the testimony of the witnesses as suspicious. That the police officer would involve an innocent worker merely because he refused to work for the police officer without compensation because the accused's allegation that the accused was publicly searched And this happened at the end of the night when people could hardly work. In such cases it can be seen to act as a machismo, especially in this period when no one feels safe on the road so no objection can be raised if the police officer is in such a situation. Served as Mashish when the case against the accused was fully established, the accused was rightly punished and sentenced property advocate from Mehrab Pur lawyer