MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE
Sections 304, Part 1, 300, Exceptions 4 and 302 died from scrutiny and the accused came to the spot and in some cases exchanged abuse and the accused attacked the accused and it is possible that the victim also Some weapons were used for defense. He and the injured were observed by the High Court that the person suffering from the injury himself or suffered self-harm was one of the main reasons which affected such results by the High Court. That is, the doctor did not exclude the possibility of injury. The doctor also said that the injuries may have been due to the fact that the accused was admitted to the hospital, due to the injuries immediately after the incident, the fact that the accused was later hospitalized. Was released from There is still a difference when the initial behavior was concerned that the doctor thinks that it was finally a minor injury. Any difference
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Shahdad Pur lawyer