NOOR AHMAD versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR
On the basis of the land reforms, the alleged tenant on the basis of section 28 was the appellant while the respondent was a competitor on a regular basis but the appellant filed a case but the plaintiff was returned to the collector. Went and the case was dropped. The Respondent (Competent Preamper) shall not be bound by the consent of the Appellant in the favor of the Appellant, without the consent of the shopkeeper, unless he or his successor becomes a party to the interest Go. Appellant's
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
