STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN versus BRIGHT LMPEX(PVT.) LTD.
The definition of the evidence of the accused AA and (83 (1C)) initially stated that they had no record and if the inspecting officers were not satisfied with such statement, they would have to search the premises. There is so much power to take and seize the records if no such attempt was made, however, and it was made and in such a situation the court had no justification to suppose that the accused had made the provisions of section 43A of the Ordinance of the Banking Companies. 1962, thus the prosecution failed to prove the charge against the accused beyond any reasonable doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Khanbel lawyer
