Find a Lawyer

CHAMAN CINEMA, KARACHI versus ABDUL JABBAR

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), rejecting Article 199 from the Service Labor Court, stating that the establishment had employed fewer than twenty persons, the 1968 ordinance. The sixth clause did not apply to the parties. However, the Labor Appellate Tribunal re-instructed employees on the basis that the employer was employing more than twenty people in its establishment, so the provisions of Ordinance VI of 1968 apply, followed by the Labor Court. No evidence was presented to the employees by the employees. Employees employed by the employer during the relevant period relied on the photostat copy of the affidavit filed by another employer's employee in another case, neither was the person examined in the present case by the employee. Nor was it cross-examined by the evidence provided by this person in another proceeding, thus, the finding in the present case could not be relied upon to order a Labor Court order before the Labor Appellate Tribunal had done wrong. The Labor Appellate Tribunal could not be retained on the basis of the evidence presented by the parties before it was denied. He was. online advocate from Pirpai lawyer