Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DIN versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL

Appeals for the reopening of the appeal by excluding section 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O, XLI R 19 and Section 151 of the Limitation (Emergency and Wartime) Act, 1965, on the ground that the appellant Cannot appear on. On the date of the hearing, when he had left the village and moved to another district due to the Indo-Pakistan war, the appeal against the decision of the appellate court was dismissed, under section 2 of Act XVIII of 1965, by the government. It was acknowledged to consider the legal position created after the notification issued from. , Under which the appellant village as well as other adjoining areas were declared as affected areas, the IDPs were allowed to extend the boundary period, with notification issued on February 1, 1973. Subsequently, the appellant's village came to the affected area and continued as it was said that the notification was not canceled. The appellant was a person displaced from the affected area in 1971, and the date of the notification was D 1 2 1973, Act XVIII. The effect under section 2 (a) was to be presented under 1965, whereby the appellant had the right to extend the limit, Appeal to Peel maintenance was handled in court. Good registration advocate from Karachi lawyer