ISHTIAQ AHMAD, ASI versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 16 National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regular 22 (2) (8) Provide security for workers to maintain peace and maintain public peace. Orders, after hearing the senior members of the National Industrial Commission, ordered the employees, who were union officials, to continue security for one year and maintain law and order and the charges against the employees were They have committed inappropriate labor and are threatening to disturb and threaten peace and public safety again. Employees who had previously failed to comply with a prohibited order passed by the Member Commission, withdrew the procession after issuing a prohibited order to the employees of the department, expelled the procession and threatened the officers of the department. Force and strain. Violations of the terms of the order approved by the MEM were placed before the Commission that employees were threatened with disrupting the sensitive section of the department, correcting police reports on provocative activities of employees, No inquiries were made before the commission, nor was the employee's application for a witness to be sought in his defense. The background of the whole case was sufficient to provide a reasonable basis for believing that employees were at the forefront of their economic activities and unfair labor practices despite repeated orders. Was necessary so reference to Section 107, CR PC was necessary. , There is no doubt about it ,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Noshki lawyer