PAKISTAN SEAMEN\'S UNION, KARACHI versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO. V, KARACHI
Sections 8 and 22 of the trade union registration collective bargaining agent were working in two registered trade union establishments and elections were not conducted with the consent of the rival unions for the selection of the collective bargaining agent, Nominations were filed and there they were. Meetings between the parties were held in full compliance with the Union Constitution for various details regarding the conduct of elections, and from the beginning of the election process to the announcement of results, the process was free from any stain and during that period Every move taken was by consensus. After the two-panel announcement (as a result the Appellant Union was declared successful), the Respondents / Defeat Unions raised certain objections to the voting list, which it was alleged to have participated in voting. Some people were not members of the union and filed an appeal to the Labor Court to cancel the election result) and the Labor Court ac cepted appe
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Taunsa sharif lawyer
