Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE B versus FARROKH CHMICAL INDUSTRIES


The High Court was not entitled to proceed on its own inquiry on any question of facts, citing the decision of the High Court in reference to the Income Tax Act 1922 section 66 (1) but to proceed to the facts and circumstances found by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Section. ? (66 (1) reference to interference of the High Court by the High Court in the finding of fact located by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Extent, unless the application of the rational by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was applied to this article or other facts) The mere fact that the High Court had any other finding would not justify the conclusion that the tribunal's findings were based on speculation, suspicion or irrelevant content.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Tarnol lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.