THE STATE versus LAL KHAN
Pakistan Penal Code Section 307/34 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 incident in which the injured person was injured in the back of the head, the incident occurred on the day, thus he falsified the evidence of the accused. Eliminated the possibility of getting involved. The injured were not only remodeled to great extent by stimulus and medical evidence, but there were also natural and potential witnesses to the incident whose presence could not have been disputed had the FIR been immediately. The eyewitness had a relationship with the injured, there was never a point to deny the clear and convincing evidence of such witnesses when their presence at the place of their presence proved beyond reasonable doubt. Was taken from defense, neither direct or circumstantial evidence was brought to the fore nor did it give reasons. There were. The trial court erred in acquitting the accused and based on a gross misinterpretation of evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer