Find a Lawyer

ABID LATIF versus

In view of the value of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 evidence, the witness, who was called a court witness, no doubt was the victim's sister-in-law, but her seat was free as she had no ax to grind. Was. There was in no way a separate place and the litigation between the first informant and his brother / suspect. The eyewitness had faithfully described the incident by swearing in the Koran of the witness, which was a result of trust that could not be taken lightly under the circumstances. The purpose of the litigation between the parties, sincere fidelity was also mentioned by the first informant that one day before the incident, there was a dispute between the victim and the accused, whose statement had not gone unnoticed. When the accused raped and attacked the victim. The presence of the deceased's mother at the scene of the incident, cannot be doubted because her presence at the site of the injuries she received in the incident is proof that as the mother of the deceased, the real culprit, from the scout. Does not allow him to be released and does not allow it to be transformed into another hypothetical crime, the testimony of the victim's mother's mother, which was solely affirmative, is sufficient to convince the prosecution, if it really is. If he wanted to make his case, the first informant could voluntarily be a witness, but he said it faithfully. The incident was reported immediately by one of the witnesses, there was no scope for it. Detectives recovered blood clot and suspected clothing that was found to contain human blood, prosecutors say. online advocate from Rawala Kot lawyer