STATE versus MUHAMMAD ZAHEER ALIAS DADA
Sections 5, 7 and 2 (c) of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 14 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 380 and 457 under section 2 (c). Absence of announcements. The order passed by the special government directing the trial by the federal government did not contain the declaration required under Section 2 KCL (C) of Ordinance XXV of 1991 although the crime against the property (Enforcement Hood) Offenses under the Ordinance 1979. Sections 808080, 7457 and 1111, the PPC could not find a place in the schedule and, therefore, in the absence of such a declaration in respect of the said offenses, the order to move the case to the special court and to deprive the ordinary courts is necessary. Was. The jurisdiction law was not legal, the transfer of the case was illegal, the special court, the landlord, could not admit the same case and the matter was returned to the sessions court for settlement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer