NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Section 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Employees dismissed on charges of corruption were reinstated to employees with benefits as the Labor Appellate Tribunal High Court upheld the Labor Courts order. Was. An appeal was allowed to appeal the accuracy so as to consider the effect of non-enforcement of the body corporate name, namely the bank which had to enforce this order and bear the burden of the previous benefits. Prior to referring to the Labor Court under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, applicable service laws, established orders, ordinances, 1968 were dismissed and appeals should have been taken advantage of by the Department's treatment. ? After the Labor Court charged that the charge sheet had not been officially compiled, they should not have investigated the law and predicted the rights of the employer to dispose of the legal defects. The appellate tribunal acted on the law's assumption that if the authorized authority did not agree with the inquiry officer on receiving the offense of the offense, he was obliged to appoint another inquiry officer and the competent authority inquired. No order can be approved against the report. Employees should have been allowed full back benefits, whether on the officer's behalf and an irrelevant inquiry or improper inquiry
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kumbh lawyer