TAUQEER AKHTAR MALIK versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PB.
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Applicants were not a party to the boycott of the examination but were threatened with physical harm so that the applicants were left defensive that they were forced to leave the examination center and He was also endorsed by the Principal's Principal. The P Authority could not deny that special examinations were conducted to allow students to reappear in similar circumstances, so it was unfair to maintain discipline in the educational institutions. Was, though, most of it. Priority and importance, yet the rights of those who were not in any way responsible for any discipline, cannot be sacrificed at the altar of sacrifice, whether or not to hold a test. There was discretion, but discretion still had to be exercised at a festival; only, properly and rationally, the authority was instructed to re-examine applicants.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Shahdad Pur lawyer
