Find a Lawyer

NUR MUHAMMAD versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, D.G. KHAN

Article 199 repealed the dismissal of the previous constitutional petition dismissed as the principal of this judiciary, where a constitutional application was withdrawn without a decision on the merit in the first constitutional petition, stating that the respondent authority Had assured the applicant to resolve his demands and because of such assurance. The applicant, while not satisfied with this assurance, withdrew his constitutional application while retaining his right to seek legal reservation and the petition was accepted by the court and the petition was rejected by the High Court. The application was rejected and rejected because it was approved by the applicant. It required that the applicant be allowed to file a constitutional petition. The objection is that the constitutional petition filed by the petitioner was withheld by the principle of res judata, especially when the previous constitutional petition was merely rejected. Developed and not criminal advocate from Daska lawyer