Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus SAIF UR REHMAN

O XVII R 3 Failure to present evidence at the postponement date of the hearing was closed after repeated opportunity for the defendant to present / conclude evidence. The reasonableness argument that the court was bound to decide the case on the same day that the case could be postponed when the defendant's evidence was closed. Defendant was allowed several occasions to be decided within a reasonable time after the evidence was lost, but he failed to take advantage of the same defendant and was then given the last opportunity for that purpose but thus before the defendant before any court. The evidence was not fully justified in closing the evidence and the correct discretion was used. Against it list of advocates from Gharo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes