Find a Lawyer

MASTER MUHAMMAD SABIR versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 354 testimony of the prosecution failed to support the statement of the victim's child that the FIR was delayed because the deceased's father was not in the house immediately after the alleged incident. A day later, when the victim's father became available, the victim's father did not do to the victim, who was his own daughter, a significant connection to the case had been lost and delayed due to the failure of the prosecution at the police station. The FIR's registration raised legitimate doubts about the FIR that the FIR was lodged after due consideration and the possibility of paying tuition for the victim / child cannot be ruled out. , The prosecution's evidence itself proved that the complainant / alleged eyewitness was unusual with the accused, not dependent on his testimony. top advocates from Kohlu lawyer