Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus FAUJI SUGAR MILLS, KHOSKI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) (b) Job Reinstatement On the charge of employee theft and dishonesty, Was charged. He was found guilty of property and domestic investigations and his services were terminated on the basis of illicit behavior; There was no male member. The theft charge against the employee was not proved by any independent and credible evidence, even the inquiry officer's report was not credible and was later changed and the matter allegedly amounted to 1/2 of the property. Had been going on for years. The stolen or misused was not more than 200 rupees The employee had already suffered substantial losses, his order to terminate his services was set aside and it was reproduced allowing only 50% back benefits. how to become a advocate from Jhudo lawyer