TALAT MEHMOOD BAIG versus MITSUJ & COMPANY LTD .
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 An application for a complaint was dismissed by the Labor Court for illegal proceedings. The request for restitution of the application was also rejected when the employee was absent after the affidavit was filed, even when the case was decided for cross-examination of the employer, there was no reasonable cause for absence. Except that he was offered a job as a secretary but after that he was forced into labor. That he was put in the wrong prison and was not allowed to leave until he was able to escape after two months because the absence was not in the copy of the memorandum of appeal provided to the employer by the employee. It was shown that the reason for his absence was unexpected or unreliable, or that the employees had presented evidence of his absence, the Labor Court had rightly dismissed his request for restitution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Saidu Sharif lawyer
