Section 13 accused of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 was in police custody in connection with a murder case, during which the contentious Kalashnikov was taken from the accused while investigating the length of the prosecution's testimony, but his Nothing was recorded to indicate. The suspect had animosity or was intended to be wrongly trapped, the record showed that Kalashnikov was not in working condition, the prosecution's witness said, if his wrong motive was to have a suspect carry a weapon that was in working condition. So the fact that none of the location witnesses to the location was related to A1, can be relied upon to reclaim testimony in the absence of any motive or illicit desire against the accused, even though he was a police officer. The conviction of the accused was maintained, but he was confessed as a juvenile at the time of the commission of the crime, according to which The sentence was reduced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
