MUHAMMAD SAJID TAUNI versus SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICES, TERMINAL NOL, KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 1 (2) (a) and 25 A Complaint Request The complaint maintained by the employee was that the complaint filed by the employee did not lie because the employer's concern with the Air Force Part of the employer's concern is yes. There was admittedly an organization that needed the help of children, widows and the families of the Armed Forces and had nothing to do with defensive preparedness or the activities of the defense staff, headed by the Chief of Air Staff. Did or had. In his board of directors, brass simply meant that his affairs were in safe hands and nothing further. The fact is that this will not automatically be sufficient to resolve a complaint against the employer's organization if, for whatever reason, a member of the employer's organization has taken any action, the request for a complaint under section 25A of the ordinance, 1969 would certainly lie at the employer's request that the employee's complaint request was not admissible. d
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Liaquat Pur lawyer