Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR versus STATE

Articles 2302 and 2 ??? Appreciating evidence The eyewitnesses cannot be accepted as fact due to natural weaknesses and material contradictions in their statements, which appear on the record lace and did not affect their confidence. No identity was identified at the time of the presence of the suspects. During those short hours, only the fleeting, speeding and momentary moments of the accused were seen, and they could not remember their facial features and physical structure. Was not presented as a witness without significant witnesses. Any justification which was a fatal flaw that led to the prosecution's disagreement. Medical evidence was not considered precisely because of the number of BF fires being carried out by the accused, the identity of the accused was not legally identified by the witnesses during the prosecution. ? Conclusion There was no evidence to show that the recovered currency notes we recovered could not be ruled out even if the accused had robbed them at the time of the incident. The confessional statement on which they were suspected. The suspects were given a hard time, and the policemen were put under pressure by the police. online advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer