MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus M. ASHRAF BHATTI
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 302/148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Article 173 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Six High Investigation Officers investigated the matter on various occasions and came to a unanimous conclusion that Both the accused and one of his co-accused were innocent and the investigation into the accused's innocence eventually led to the confirmation of the DIG, who also explained that both could be released after which the Investigation Officer discharged. Prepared a report for and presented to a magistrate who did not agree with the report. Orders were routinely passed without applying their court mind, which instructed the investigating officer to be held in column 2 of the challan and any order to be dismissed by the Magistrate's Order of Magistrate would be given below by the Appellate Court. Was not challenged in the review before, but the court refused to intervene and retain. The order of the magistrates' court was challenged in the constitutional jurisdiction. The High Court magistrate's ion admitted that the order was issued without looking at the record before him and that any speech as usual without using his judicial mind. The order was not approved, the High Court, under the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction, declared the following court's coordination orders illegal and the case magistrate was remanded. Passing the Speech Order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Shahpur Chakar lawyer