In the subsequent case of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the accused accused of exploiting doubt, failed in a malicious case against the defendant's witnesses, who had the aforementioned offender. There was no malice against. I was not charged with merely saying that because the acquitted accused had been granted a leave petition for appeal against the High Court order which resulted in the failure of the malpractice case. The result of was deleted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
