Find a Lawyer

PETER ERASTOS versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 397 and 561A Customs Act (IV 1969), Articles 156 (1) (8) and 178 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Article 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) )), Article 199 On two different occasions the two convicted under two different laws is whether the subsequent conviction was to be accompanied by the first sentence which should be decided by the competent court in an appeal or review. Earlier, the conviction was sought under the Customs Act and thereafter the accused was prayed under the prohibition order under the direction of Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), to order the punishment to be consolidated, Forbidden Order No appeal or revision was filed against the convict or the appellate court was then entitled to the order. The sentence should run concurrently with the previous sentence, neither the exercise of heritage powers nor the exercise of jurisdiction under the High Court Section 561A, CRPC, Article 199 (1973) of the Constitution. I will direct or substitute the simultaneous sentence with the preceding sentence famous high court advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer