Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus PAKISTAN

The trial court dismissed the service dismissed by section 4 (i) (c) and 6 against his dismissal, but the appellate court rejected the decision and decision in the appeal filed by the employer. The lawsuit was filed under In the `` by in '' by the employees, the terms of section 197 of Section 3 of the Act were denied, the employees in their review of the judgment of the appellate court, claiming that only those cases were exempt under section Act. Had, as such, been within the scope of the Service. The tribunal was established under the Act 1973 while its case was not within the jurisdiction of the service tribunal as its order of dismissal was approved before July 1, 1969, under section 4 (1) (c) of the Act. Was relied upon to prove the provisions. During the appellate court's decision and the decision was passed by the appellate court, its arguments were not accepted by the appellate court, the decision was not properly decided by the appellate court below, its decision and order were set aside. And the remand for the judgment of this case was obtained in the light of Section 4 (1) (c). top advocate from Ghazi lawyer