Find a Lawyer

HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION EMPLOYEES\' UNION PUNJAB (REGD.), CBA, LAHORE versus G.M. HBFC, LAHORE ZONE

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 15 (1) (d) (i) (ii) unfair labor practice by the employer Petitioner Labor Union, which was not only a formally registered trade union, but is also a certified collective bargaining agent ( CBA). Empire Corporation Employer Corporation filed a Demand Notice on Disapproval of Applicant's Demands, Notice of Strike Through Applicants Concerning Dispute Relations between Parties, Members, Applicants' Union Officers, and Other Active Members The front is pending. , Was ordered by the employer corporation to move to another province and all these applicant union members have also been threatened with serious danger if they are pending industrial disputes between the parties, officials and other registered members of the register. Will not be reluctant to suppress the exchange order on their demands. Whatever the trade union agents were, the purpose of their bargaining was to disrupt their participation in the process, there was nothing to stress but simply because their trade union activities were similar to those of the employer corporation. The operation of the Act was inappropriate labor in the meaning of section 15 (i) (d) (i) (ii) of the Ordinance, 1969. They were deprived of their legitimate right to stay in place to participate in legal proceedings, victimized by the employer. female advocates from Kohat lawyer