THE STATE versus NOOR MUHAMMAD
Section 497 (5) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 380/420 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement of Hoodwood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 14 bail, Transformers revocation of which were public property theft / misdemeanor. Was used, the ability to be a Wapda employee and the guardianship of the accused and a stolen transformer were also recovered from his possession. The CRPC had to pay a premium against it. Allegations that despite being in custody for only a month, they were not presented to the court in the affirmative; Was not entitled because the crimes against them did not fall under the Prohibited Clause or the investigation was completed in this case, resulting in a bail granted by the magistrate. Ed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ranipur lawyer