Find a Lawyer

SAHIBZADA SHEHERYAR ABBASI versus SAMIA ABBASI

The dissolution of the Muslim Marriage Marriage Act, 1939, in accordance with the duty of the Court of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section 5 and Schedule Khulla Solution Kh. ? It was the duty of the court to examine the facts and circumstances that came before the facts and circumstances and, on the basis of which, the Khola to obtain the wife's privilege to obtain adequate satisfaction, the Family Court did not exercise any such practice. Who had blessed Khulla with his wife. Without making any reference to the evidence presented by the husband, there is no reason that the Family Court has supported the finding that it was not possible for the parties to live together because the husband and wife cassette were presented by the husband to the court. Which shows that even after the filing of the suit the parties continued to meet with each other and their relationship was always pleasant and friendly. With such evidence as well as evidence presented in court. The testimony and the testimony also show that the wife celebrated her birthday in the husband's house; Depending on the satisfaction of the court, the refusal to dissolve the marriage would force the parties to dissolve the crucial evidence while in the hate union, the decision rendered by the Family Court was declared without legal authority. And it did not have any legal effect, the case was remanded to settle the case again. how to become a advocate from FR Bannu lawyer