MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P.
Article 199 During the hearing of his constitutional petition while withdrawing from the court of the Appellant / Lux Standish applicant, Article 199 that he will provide the bank guarantee equal to the total amount received from the respondents which should be submitted by the due date. Through the date set by the court for the issuance of a bank guarantee, instead of offering such a guarantee (this would allow us to withdraw our constitutional request because it contained certain defects) ) The withdrawal of the constitutional petition was just a tool to prevent compliance with the order. Following the court's withdrawal, the controversial statement and the applicant's action cannot be allowed to present the requisite bank guarantee for the applicant not accepting his pledge, he has withdrawn his constitutional petition. To soften the pledge. Which cannot allow it to be misused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer