Find a Lawyer

YAR MUHAMMAD DURRAIANA versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

R 4 The professional publicity of a civil servant was postponed due to pending investigation against him. The authority should have examined whether allegations against a public servant, if established, would have demanded a modest fine or did not demand a major penalty. The promotion of public employee was only mechanically postponed so that the professional promotion of the public servant was not considered and the public servant was entitled to be considered for proforma promotion in violation of the official policy. For this, his case was wrong and illegal. It was important to consider such relevant history until the service record of the postponed government employee on the relevant date and in the subsequent events there can be no basis for dismissing his claim for professional promotion. jobs for advocates from Kohlu lawyer