Find a Lawyer

NASEEM AKHTAR DURRANI versus MST. ABIDA SULTAN

Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961 Section 6 (5) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The present wife was married to the applicant in Rawalpindi, where she herself was also residing. Could have been done. The union committee in which the current wife resided in Rawalpindi was charged under Family Law Petitioner by Rule 3 (a) of the Rules that the aforesaid area was not permitted by the Arbitration Council before a second marriage contract was established in Murree. Lee was. The second marriage contract was finalized in Murree, yet under Section 6 (5) of the Ordinance, two essential components, namely the residence of the present wife and the location of the arbitration council, were located in a Rawalpindi court area. Along with Rawalpindi, the magistrate in Murree also had jurisdiction to hear the complaint filed by the defendant (the present wife) and before the trial court-approved verdicts in Rawalpindi, without any serious exception being opened. Demand to seek a trial that resulted in the constitutional application being thrown out of bounds advocates from Jandanwala lawyer