Contrary to the contents of the document, Article 5 Oral Evidence, Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Scheduled Convocation (Article 10 of 1984), the plaintiff had clearly indicated that the amount of Dover entered into it. It was entered into and the husband was able to seek the demand through his evidence, claiming that the dower's money was actually paid at the time of marriage The oral evidence was included by the husband against the contents of the documents, such evidence Can be considered unacceptable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
