THE STATE versus DANIEL BOYD (MUSLIM NAME SAIFULLAH)
Section 17 (3) Explaining the definition of Evidence Code (XLV of 1860), SS 506/34 and 411 evidence, despite the error / correction, the statement of the two witnesses was faith-based, saying the witnesses and the victims were ineligible witnesses. Were. The accused witnesses and the victim did not have any bad wishes but the inquiry was scheduled but they were not scattered on the material details of the case, from the first statements of the same witnesses or to any witnesses. There was no contradiction with the statement. Such witnesses can be identified, therefore, were true witnesses and had no ax to grind, their testimony was the true point of the incident.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Miran Shah lawyer
