SHAFI MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Articles 5 and 11 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Sections 5 of the Speedy Trials Ordinance 1991 (XX of 1965), Section 7 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 Rejected. It is necessary for the accused to observe that without jurisdiction, that is, no specific reference is being made to the special court for the special case to admit any matter under the government's ordinance written order. , The condition was declared necessary in his absence. It was irrelevant to any legal force and in carrying out any proceeding in any way it would clearly be an illegal matter with any legal permission and consequently the courts of the full jurisdiction , Including the option to consider bail. The special court order on the affidavit was unlikely to reject the bail plea
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Hala lawyer
