ALLAH DITTA versus THE STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Complaints Regulation (XLV of 1860), the complainant of the section 161 Trap Case, preached by the accused, himself went to the Anti-Corruption Department, lodged the complaint, petitioned for its resolution, the tainted, The money itself provided and then assigned to the role assigned to it during the raid and recovery process, the complainant, without any imagination, especially in the light of Sharia, did not declare a decisive witness. can go.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer
